http://www.tmttlt.com/2006/06/09/hyperlinked-society/ All those topics that i wish i had time to pursue more earnestly. Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:40:54 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.tmttlt.com/2006/06/09/hyperlinked-society/comment-page-1/#comment-75 Open Notebook: Hyperlinked Society Conference Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:09:25 +0000 http://www.tmttlt.com/archives/2006/06/09/4836/#comment-75 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Best online notes award goes to Dave Weinberger.  What some others have to say: link, link, link, , link, link, link.  And there's always technorati. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Best online notes award goes to Dave Weinberger.  What some others have to say: link, link, link, , link, link, link.  And there’s always technorati. [...]

]]> http://www.tmttlt.com/2006/06/09/hyperlinked-society/comment-page-1/#comment-74 jason Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:06:05 +0000 http://www.tmttlt.com/archives/2006/06/09/4836/#comment-74 I'm happy that you're there and all. Safe and sound. But what a yawn-fest. Sure, someone cares about all this. But... sigh. That said, "sometimes we need the human filter. irrellvant stuff is ‘killing the blogosphere’" is interesting. As usual there is the taken for granted assumption that the purpose is "relevance", that any realisitic % of the folks blogging give a flying fuck about the blogosphere, and that people who are meta-bloggers are in touch, really care about or are cared about by the blogging community at large. Seems like information science echos of what I heard at SXSW in 2003 when the journalists were trying to figure out how to bring the broadcast hegemony into focus over the 'blogging problem'. I guess there's not much reflection on what we wanted the internet to be pre-95. I’m happy that you’re there and all. Safe and sound. But what a yawn-fest. Sure, someone cares about all this. But… sigh. That said, “sometimes we need the human filter. irrellvant stuff is ‘killing the blogosphere’” is interesting. As usual there is the taken for granted assumption that the purpose is “relevance”, that any realisitic % of the folks blogging give a flying fuck about the blogosphere, and that people who are meta-bloggers are in touch, really care about or are cared about by the blogging community at large. Seems like information science echos of what I heard at SXSW in 2003 when the journalists were trying to figure out how to bring the broadcast hegemony into focus over the ‘blogging problem’. I guess there’s not much reflection on what we wanted the internet to be pre-95.

]]>