Comments on: Adultery could mean life | Battle Creek Enquirer – www.battlecreekenquirer.com – Battle Creek, Mich. http://www.tmttlt.com/2007/01/17/adultery-could-mean-life-battle-creek-enquirer-wwwbattlecreekenquirercom-battle-creek-mich/ All those topics that i wish i had time to pursue more earnestly. Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:40:54 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: jason http://www.tmttlt.com/2007/01/17/adultery-could-mean-life-battle-creek-enquirer-wwwbattlecreekenquirercom-battle-creek-mich/comment-page-1/#comment-186 jason Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:50:09 +0000 http://www.tmttlt.com/archives/2007/01/17/5270/#comment-186 lol. I can't but disagree with everyone. adultry cannot be banned for biblical reasons, because you can't take only part of the bible, as jesus says. It is all or nothing with christianity. And there's nothing 'wrong' with adultry, "Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse," where does it say that doing this it itself wrong. Non-standard, yes. Frowned upon, yes. Only the puritans seem to have a problem with it. lol. I can’t but disagree with everyone. adultry cannot be banned for biblical reasons, because you can’t take only part of the bible, as jesus says. It is all or nothing with christianity.

And there’s nothing ‘wrong’ with adultry, “Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse,” where does it say that doing this it itself wrong. Non-standard, yes. Frowned upon, yes. Only the puritans seem to have a problem with it.

]]> By: Nancy Baym http://www.tmttlt.com/2007/01/17/adultery-could-mean-life-battle-creek-enquirer-wwwbattlecreekenquirercom-battle-creek-mich/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Nancy Baym Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:33:35 +0000 http://www.tmttlt.com/archives/2007/01/17/5270/#comment-185 Of course not, but I'm of the opinion that efforts to ban gay marriage by constitutional amendment should be replaced by efforts to ban adultery by constitutional amendment. After all the Bible is MUCH clearer on that one, and there's no question which one undermines the institution of wedlock more seriously... Of course not, but I’m of the opinion that efforts to ban gay marriage by constitutional amendment should be replaced by efforts to ban adultery by constitutional amendment. After all the Bible is MUCH clearer on that one, and there’s no question which one undermines the institution of wedlock more seriously…

]]>