Posts from — June 2003
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:40:11 GMT
seeing things. the bourgeois left in Labor. Thats P.P. McGuinness saying that in the Sydney Morning Herald. Who would that be? Are… [Junk for Code]
there is the labour international ….
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:38:12 GMT
I'm disappointed by the apparent lack of interop in iChat AV; since I won't use AIM or .Mac it looks useless to me. My impression is that Mac users have been clamoring not for yet another Mac-only videoconferencing app, but for something that can interop; in that respect iChat AV doesn't contribute anything. [Hack the Planet]
seems to contribute one heck of alot for those that can use it though. i tested it between here and nyc and chicago. i can see that this will make a difference, not tomorrow, but right now. I can do live f2f in 3 sec, instead of the 15 minute setups it used to take using gnome.
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:36:15 GMT
PHP5, MySQL, and Licensing. It seems that Sterling and others are talking about the licensing conflict between PHP (BSD) and MySQL's updated client library (GPL). This may be a bit premature, since the folk at MySQL are considering a blanket exemption for Open Source projects with OSI approved licenses. Yo, MySQL folks! What's the word? Can we get this straightened out before too many people blow it out of proportion? Zak? How 'bout it? If there's anything the Open Source freaks are good at,… [Jeremy Zawodny's blog]
why wouldn't they just use the lgpl for the mysql libraries? seems the right solution.
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:34:44 GMT
OpenContent's David Wiley, Educational License Project Lead.
David Wiley, Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology at Utah State University and founder of the trailblazing OpenContent, is Project Lead for development of an educational use Creative Commons license, which begins today.
Welcome, Professor Wiley.
Read the first draft.
Review our earlier discussion on the subject.
Join the current discussion.
Read the press release.
this is a nifty project. I like the educational aspects. knowledge should be free to obtain, at least its most basic levels.
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:29:17 GMT
The Economy of Policy. No Tax Relief for Married Poor. Because they, presumably, are not American. [MetaFilter]
someday, maybe, someone will fix taxes to be something reasonable instead of law after law after law of abolute wrongness and silliness.
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:26:47 GMT
Could somebody please tell me, given that we are half way to 2004 in the 21st goddamn century, why I cannot print a web page without losing 50% of all the words on the right hand edge of the page. And it's not just IE, Firebird is just as bad!
the reason is called windows, you are probably using it.
June 24, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 01:31:48 GMT
June 23, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:25:15 GMT
TECHNOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL UNIFICATION: This blog is really transformational for me. Just when I think I have heard all perspectives, I'm awakened to new viewpoints. Case in point… I was with a very respectable customer today. It was clear that these folks get the value of human interaction given the market they are in (PURE knowledge creation and subsequent value generation), but architecture somehow gets in the way.
Halfway through our discussion, a very bright fellow in the crowd offers that “decentralized software disrupts the value that we, as a corporation, bring to the table. These highly valued employees will just leave us, as teams, if we allow edge-based agility. We give them POWER.” Sigh… Shrug… Fascinating…
As we slog through the adoption of emergent technologies, it is clear to me that technology isn't the issue. In fact, it is a complete NON-ISSUE. I'm reminded by my anthropology buddies that technology is a mere tool. Until the tribe adapts it's social viewpoint (read: culture, values, memes, networks), technology is nothing but an enabler versus a real change agent.
[Michael Helfrich's Radio Weblog]
Michael is spot on. If you want to see how powerful his insight is there is a gem of a book called “The Dynamics of military revolution” edited by Knox and Murray. They look at many epoch changing technical innovations in the military such as the introduction of longbows, muskets, rifles etc and show that it takes about a generation, or a bad war, to make the social adjustment. IE consider the rifle. At the beginning of the civil war, tactics demanded that men line up facing each other and pour it on. By the end of the war, everyone who could get into trench did so. BUT the Europeans missed the whole point and spent much of the first 6 months on WWI charging into machine gun and rifle fire. In WWII, the French and the Brits had in total more tanks than the Germans but they deployed them as infantry support weapons. The german, by losing the last war, had created an entirely new method – Blitzkrieg. The key is to make the cultural shift and then the doctrine shift. You deploy the new in a new way. if you deploy the new in the old way – 'we keep all the knowldge inside', you fail.
Culture always determines how tools are being used. Cultures that are unable to properly use them will fall behind cultures that creatively use new tools. TV was viewed as radio with pictures for years. The internet has been viewed as TV over a network. We are just beginning to get an idea of just how different it is. [A Man with a Ph.D. - Richard Gayle's Weblog]
–+–
technology and culture are not separable, culture, and each of its little functions, is a technology, it developed over time, it has creators, etc. it is a technology. technology likewise is cultural, one culture does not necessarily have the same technologies and techniques as another. we cannot easily say that cultures can or cannot in the manner above because it is entirely unclear, because it is clear that there is certainly at least one person in nearly any culture that can, in short, one that is not bound a tightly to the culture, but yet is still embedded in it. likewise, to say cannot means that there is no possibility that someone in the culture, can, and that is unlikely unless the culture is more or less dead. cultures adapt, technologies do to, they operate the same way as the same set of techniques.
June 23, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:21:40 GMT
MoveOn's online primary starts Tuesday..
[aka propagandart]
A very interesting experiment in online democracy. The results will be interesting. [A Man with a Ph.D. – Richard Gayle's Weblog
that's tomorrow….
June 23, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:20:11 GMT
Girls and boys, today's concept is transduction. Adrian Mackenzie, Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed. London: Continuum, 2002. Or see [Purse Lip Square Jaw]
I've been meaning to read this for a few months now
June 23, 2003 No Comments