Category — General
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:59:15 GMT
The Microsoft mental framework, i.e. The Microsoft 'box'. Study: Windows Can Be Cheaper to Use Than Linux: “SEATTLE (Reuters) – Developing Windows-based applications is easier and cheaper than making Linux (news – web sites)-based applications, according to a study paid for by Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq:MSFT – news) and released on Monday.” “The study compared applications built to run over the Internet on Microsoft's .NET platform to applications developed with J2EE, a development platform backed by Sun Microsystems Inc. (Nasdaq:SUNW – news) favored by the Linux community.” While the above study appears to have revealed that developing with .NET might be cheaper than J2EE, there does not seem to be any relevance to software development in general. Further, if indeed it is true that developing relevant applications with .NET is cheaper than developing them with J2EE, one can easily assume that Microsoft spent more money in designing the study such that it report on those aspects that Microsoft 'strategy' is cheaper. I don't think anyone doubts that some Microsoft software might be better than other software. However, if this was meant to be a PR statement, it is a very poor one indeed. Hey Microsoft, people out there think outside of the Microsoft 'box'…. [infosophy: socio-technological rendering of information]
September 9, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:13:08 GMT
The Chilean “socialist Internet” – circa 1972!
When Pinochet's military overthrew the Chilean government 30 years ago, they discovered a revolutionary communication system, a 'socialist internet' connecting the whole country. Its creator? An eccentric scientist from Surrey, UK named Stafford Beer.
This is a fascinating story. And yes, he really did link up Chile in '72 – long before the Internet…
though it was a network, i don't think it was an internetlike network, it was closer to a phone network, but the uses it is put to are interesting and worth exploring/mentioning, because implicitely this is what post-fordist political economy is interested in, the mechanisms that allow economies to operate, in this case it was a very real technics, but in other places it is cultures, beliefs, fantasies, etc.
September 9, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:08:11 GMT
AAUP Issues Policy Statement on Contingent Appintments and the Academic Profession. Ten years ago, the Association reported that non-tenure-track appointments accounted for about 58 percent of all faculty positions in American higher education. As of 1998, such appointments still accounted for nearly three out of five faculty positions, in all types… [Invisible Adjunct]
I'm not sure if there are any real solutions to any problems, if they are problems in this arena. I've been non-tenure track faculty since '98 and it can be a great job, though I don't teach as much as adjuncts. One thing that has happened to cause the growth of professional faculty such as myself is the information technology boom where you needed to increase the technical workers in higher education to allow students to take advantage of technology. This is happening again in research universities with the future biotech bust, where they have to hire alot of staff to support one professors research, expanding the professional ranks, etc.
September 9, 2003 No Comments
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:03:28 GMT
Uncitedness. Here's an interesting article from a decade ago with (perhaps)
surprising figures on the uncitedness
of academic articles by discipline. It seems disheartening to observe
that much published research doesn't seem to be of use to other
researchers – at least not enough to warrant a citation. I wonder how
things have evolved
since.
Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now?
and chemistry had the lowest rates of uncitedness — 36.7% and 38.8% of
the papers published in those disciplines, respectively, were not cited
at all in the 4 years following publication. [...] The figure for engineering, however, is above that average — well above
it, in fact. More than 72% of all papers published in engineering had no
citations at all. Pendlebury says he is at a loss to explain this anomaly,
although he suggests that “sociological factors” might influence the way
engineering researchers cite each other's work.
[...] But scientists, social and otherwise, can take heart. Within the arts
and humanities (where admittedly citation is not so firmly entrenched),
uncitedness figures hit the ceiling. Consider, for example, theater (99.9%),
American literature (99.8%), architecture (99.6%), and religion (98.2%).
And, in one curious anomaly, articles in history (95.5%) and philosophy
(92.1%) were relatively uncited, while those in history and philosophy
of science (29.2%) were not.
This has also got me wondering about rates of unlinkedness for weblog
posts. Surely they are huge – though it should be kept in mind that in
the blogosphere the order is “publish, then filter” rather than the other way around.
[Seb's Open Research]
——-
I'm not sure of the methods used here, but I know the ISI recently cited isn't very revealing for social sciences and humanities. However, i think that there are several reasons why the traditions are different in measurements here. Primarily i think it might have to do something with the draft-dissemination models that occur before publishing. A draft dissemination model is how drafts come to be read before printed by their audiences. some traditions have this strongly embedded others do not.
My other thought on this is that citations should go up as knowledge communities get narrower in focus, and thus have fewer people involved. In large disciplines this then is an indication of fragmentation, or the multiplications of many subdisciplines, as there are in the hard sciences, where physics is just something you teach to underclassmen and upperclasswomen choose and begin to learn a subdiscipline.
September 9, 2003 No Comments
Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:02:59 GMT
social construction of technology. In class today, we were introduced to the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) framework/methodology. I am certainly not an expert… [zephoria]
——-
I'm not a big fan of SCOT finding epistemological and methodological problems with the paradigmaticity of technics in most of that work, but many people find it very useful.
September 8, 2003 No Comments
Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:44:55 GMT
Adjunct College. Well, now that I've got a handle on this blogging thing, I think I'm finally ready to get with the programme. I've had done with such old-fashioned notions as the history profession as guild, academic work as quasi-sacred calling, the… [Invisible Adjunct]
——-
this is the beginning of the end of something, though i'm not sure what, though surely if this becomes profitable, it will be increasingly problematic for many universities.
September 8, 2003 No Comments
last bite from the werewolves of london
this is too bad, he was an interesting character.
September 8, 2003 No Comments
Virginia Tech's name
Virginia Tech is the nickname of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. there is no Virginia Tech University. Read the style guide for guidance.
September 7, 2003 No Comments
do other people get these?
i get these types of spams, they look real enough, but i'm not interested as i'm not a spammer, and actually i really dislike spam immensely so i thought i'd share.
September 7, 2003 No Comments
reverse cowgirl is gone
Susannah Breslin has apparently removed her blog reverse cowgirl, closed her email and moved on from this arena and no one seems to know why. She had the blog that garnered much of my attention to cool and interesting art, things like the hello kitty .45 1911 variant target pistol, and the pub1c ha1r grooming guide are key parts of the cultural awareness that now are gone.
September 7, 2003 No Comments