Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:02:04 GMT
CALL FOR PROPOSALS: DRH 2004
**** Deadline: March 15th 2004 ****
DRH 2004: Digital Resources for the Humanities
University of Newcastle, UK
Sunday 5th September ö Wednesday 8th September 2004
Conference URL – http://drh2004.ncl.ac.uk/
The DRH conferences have established themselves firmly in the UK and
international calendar as a major forum bringing together scholars,
librarians, archivists, curators, information scientists and computing
professionals in a unique and positive way, to share ideas and information
about the creation, exploitation, management and preservation of digital
resources in the arts and humanities.
The 2004 Conference aims to address some of the key emerging themes and
strategic issues that engagement with ICT is bringing to humanities
computing and scholarly research. Themes for 2004 include:
á Methods in humanities computing
á Cross-sector exchange between heritage, national and local government, and
education bodies
á Broadening the humanities computing base
á New forms of scholarly publication
Proposals for individual papers and full sessions addressing these themes
are invited. Proposers should indicate which of the themes their papers
will seek to address.
DRH also has a tradition of supporting and encouraging new scholars and as
such will be showcasing postgraduate research. Postgraduates are invited to
submit proposals for short papers of approximately 15 minutes duration
Please visit the website at http://drh2004.ncl.ac.uk for full details of the
conference and how to submit proposals.
Email enquiries are also welcome at drh@ncl.ac.uk
March 1, 2004 No Comments
and everyone lived happily ever after….
or did they? oh this is highly problematic…..
March 1, 2004 No Comments
unofficial: buy a librarian a beer day
tomorrow, march 2, is unofficially “Buy a Librarian a Beer” day.
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:16:36 GMT
Brutal article on declining computer science enrollments. Today's New York Times carries an article entitled “Microsoft, Amid Dwindling Interest, Talks Up Computing as a Career” about Bill Gates going around to universities encouraging young people to major in computer science. The chairman of EECS at MIT worries about the decline in enrollment (10 years ago his predecessor fretted about the explosion in enrollment; sic transit gloria major). All too close to home… [Philip Greenspun Weblog]
—–
i wonder why people don't want to go to school to learn these skills…… any thoughts?
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:51:11 GMT
Most Americans aged 18 to 35 support gay marriage, according to a NY Times article yesterday. It's often the case that bigotry dies with the generation that embraces it… [www.gulker.com - words and pictures from Silicon Valley]
—–
and then is picked up by the next generation… bigotry is likely cyclical…..
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 17:24:52 GMT
6th "INTERNATIONAL SUMMER ACADEMY ON TECHNOLOGY STUDIES": ANNOUNCEMENT AND CALL FOR PAPERS 6th International Summer Academy on Technology Studies: ãUrban Infrastructure in Transition: What can we learn from history?ä Deutschlandsberg, Austria, July 11 ö 17, 2004 Organized by Inter-University Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture (IFZ), Graz. Cities are powerfully shaped by socio-technical networks and infrastructures. These organize and mediate the distribution of people, goods, services, information, waste, capital, and energy within, and between, urban regions. The quality of urban life (50% of the worldâs population live in cities) depends heavily on urban infrastructures and service systems (water, sewage, energy, transport, telecommunications). Achieving sustainable urban infrastructure networks is vital if cities are to thrive or even function in the long term. The Summer Academy 2004 will focus on the transition of urban infrastructure in view of changing framework conditions and new challenges in a historical perspective. A starting point is the contemporary debate about urban infrastructure, in which you hardly can find a reference to historical experiences. This is precisely where the discussions of this yearâs Summer Academy will raise the following questions: - What can historical analysis of the development and design of urban technical infrastructure systems contribute to an understanding of the current transition process? - What can we learn from history to manage current challenges for our water, electricity, telecommunications, and transport systems? - What can we learn from history for a sustainable design and governance of infrastructure technology networks in the present and future? The main objectives of the Summer Academy are to explore: - the process of transition of urban technical infrastructure systems and urban technology networks in a historical perspective, - strategies for a more sustainable, i. e. socially and environmentally friendly design of urban technologies as an issue of technology studies and technology policy, - the contribution of urban infrastructure systems for a sustainable development of cities or urban areas in general. CALL FOR PAPERS Participants are encouraged to present a paper related to one of the following topics: 1) Political aspects of urban technology This topic focuses on the question of organization, regulation, design and governance of urban infrastructure concerning the following issues: Relationship between market/politics and the private and public sector of the economy; systems of services of general interest; structures of governance, measures of managing technical progress (transition management), technical regimes, path dependencies; actors (private and public institutions, municipalities, countries, national states, trans-national actors); decision- making process and role of key decision-makers in determining the choice of services to be provided (system builders); concepts of participation, beyond centralization. 2) Social aspects of urban technology This topic of the social impacts or the social importance of urban infrastructures includes the following issues: Systems of technical infrastructures as a socially and environmentally sound technology; impacts on the environment; concepts or visions of public assistance or fundamental public services; changes in the understanding of services of general interest (or in the definition of basic needs); tensions between technical network integration and social, political and cultural integration/disintegration processes; relationship between citizens and public authorities; users, consumption patterns, life-styles. 3) Cultural aspects of urban technology This topic focuses on the interaction between the transformation of urban infrastructures and cultural change (discourses). The main issues in this context are: Interrelations between the process of modernization (transition of urban technology) and cultural change; theories of infrastructure; discourses of modernization, technology as a symbol of modernity, ideas/visions and self concepts of modern or (in a contemporary context) sustainable cities; urbanity; criticism of urban technology and civilization. Please submit a one page abstract and a maximum of one page on your work and research background. The deadline for submissions is Friday, April 2, 2004. You will be notified of acceptance by April 19. A maximum of 40 participants will be accepted. The language of the conference will be English. FEES ¥ 290.ö The fee covers the conference proceedings and materials, coffee and refreshments as well as social events during the week. Accommodation ¥ 358.ö to ¥ 418.ö The charge includes accommodation (six nights) and half board (breakfast and lunch) for the period of Sunday evening to Friday evening. Rooms have been reserved by the organisers. GRANTS A special grant scheme covering travel costs, accommodation and fees will be open to NIS (New Independent States of the former Soviet Union) Young Scientists. Participants from Central and South Eastern European and developing countries may also request financial support. INFORMATION AND REGISTRATION For further information or registration form, please visit our web site: http:// www.ifz.tugraz.at/index.php/sumac
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:35:49 GMT
there is something to be said for taking care and managing the presentation of your self and your concerns online. lots of times, i just want to warn people toward being conservative about this, against creating possible misunderstandings and increasing the overall chance that someone will group you without really knowing what you are up to. People tend to be tribal and this creates us vs. them dynamics all over, when they need not, i find it problematic… care of the self can help avoid these misunderstandings.
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:22:26 GMT
New Australian PhD Weblog. New Australian PhD weblog on Internet Genealogy Research by Kylie Veale. Welcome to research blogging!… [creativity/machine]
—–
Kylie has a blog, but no feed:(
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:36:21 GMT
Twisted: there's an ad in the New York Times today congratulating President Bush for backing an amendment to the Constitution to deny marriage to gay and lesbian people. The ad compares him to President Lincoln, and is signed by many of the groups and people that I have pledged, for Lent, to study and try to understand.
So, please help me understand this: President Lincoln strove to protect the rights of a minority at the costs of thousands of lives lost in the Civil War, and indeed, of his own life. President Bush is the first President ever to attempt to restrict the rights of a minority group with a Constitutional amendment.
The link, I guess is the courts: Lincoln defied the Supreme Court's infamous Dred Scott decision, whereas President Bush styles his initiative as opposing 'activist judges.'
I find this an incredibly twisted comparison: pandering to prejudice takes no moral courage, in my mind. Standing up for a powerless minority takes enormous moral courage, the likes of which we see perhaps a handful of times in a century, if that. Please, help me, understand this. Am I wrong? Is this just not meanness and hate? [www.gulker.com - words and pictures from Silicon Valley]
–
I think you really have to try to understand the other side of the argument before you call it meanness and hate. It certainly is exceptionalism and bias, but i don't think that all of the people that believe this about marriage are mean and hateful, but i do think that some are, but there are mean and hateful people on the other side too, that's just the way populations are distributed. Contrarily, i think that anyone that wants to marry another person of reasonable responsible age should be allowed to, but that marriage in that case is a state-union, and that limited gender marriages should be the provenance of religion. Let the church say you can't get married in our building, then go get married elsewhere, that is what freedom and equality conveys as citizens of the u.s. I don't think that i would be a citizen in the same way if the religious rule was constitutionalized, in fact, i would generally feel oppressed, because one freedom that i had, but did not use woudl be removed from me.
March 1, 2004 No Comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:27:24 GMT
Pew Internet: “44% of Internet users have created content for the online world through building or posting to Web sites, creating blogs, and sharing files.” [Scripting News] [A blog doesn't need a clever name]
——
I personally don't know anyone that hasn't in some way or another put something online….. this is by definition true, because if they hadn't, and hadn't told me, then how would i know them, and if they had and had told me then i would know… anyway, my ipod went from 2/3 full when i went to bed to dead tonight. it is time to get a new one i think.
March 1, 2004 No Comments