Posts from — March 2004

Mcluhan's CBC archives. Also by way of Mark, comes these CBC archival Mcluhan clips…. [Networking Knowledge & the Digital Age]

——

cold, cold media found here.

Signing Off. Gentle Readers, A few months ago, I made a vow to myself that this would be my last semester as an invisible adjunct. Since Iâve failed to secure a full-time position in my final attempt at the academic job market,… [Invisible Adjunct]

—–

it was nice reading her work:)

Real losses.

Invisible Adjunct has announced that she will be leaving academia and giving up her blog. It’s a very considerable loss – her blog has been wry, balanced, and very very smart. It’s become the core of a real community. She’s going to be missed.

[Crooked Timber]

—-

yep, ia is moving on. it is likely the best available choice.

DHS.

Homeland Security Job: Director, Entertainment Liason Office

[Wizbang]

——-

from the 'scary, really scary implications dept.' they control what you watch, they control what you know, they control who says what, to whom and through what microphone…… or perhaps they just want to, or perhaps people believe they don't want to, yet they still want to have some say… who are they? is the american?

Second How to Research Blog. adaldlkka kla… [Vlog 2.1]

——

interesting idea, teaching blogging to research students so they can blog their research….

MacEnvy. “Hey, where'd you get the FireFox MacOSX theme?”, I asked Graeme, leaning over to get a better look at his monitor. All of the tabs and forms looked exactly like he was ope… [Catspaw's Guide to the Inevitably Insane]

——-

new explorations into the gendered interface and the meanings of commercialization… perhaps.

Open Source, Voter Verifiable Voting.

The Open Voting Consortium (with which I am affiliated) is going to be demonstrating an open source, voter veriable, auditable, accessible to physically disabled voters, voting system that runs on commodity hardware and freely available operating systems:

http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/ad/ovc-mar22-pressrelease.pdf

[CaveBear Blog]

—–

nifty, this could save alot of money.

Call for position papers

The ECOOP-04 Workshop ÎPhilosophy, Ontology and Information Systemsâ aims at providing a forum where the issues related to the use of philosophical ontology in object oriented information systems can be discussed.

Key goals of the workshop are to secure, as far as possible, a measure of agreement on:

- What philosophical ontology is,
- Whether, and how, ontology can assist in object oriented software development,
- What philosophical ontology can add to the debate on the mapping between objects in the real world and system objects,
- What the key obstacles to the deployment of ontology are,
- The possibility of collaborative research efforts among the participants.

People interested in participating in the workshop are requested to submit a short position paper (5 pages or less) that indicates the issues they wish to have discussed in the workshop and/or relevant work they have done.
The workshop organizers will review and select from the submitted papers providing feedback as needed. Position papers will be posted prior to the workshop so as to give participants the time to read the papers beforehand.

Examples of the kinds of issues that could be raised are:

- How do the definitions of philosophical ontology and ontology used in information science differ?
- What can software engineers and philosophers gain from such comparison?
- What is object oriented software engineering currently lacking that philosophical ontology can provide?
- If any, which guidelines or constraints can ontological philosophy provide in order to assist software engineering?
- What areas in particular would benefit most from philosophical ontology? What is the scope of relevance (including the limitations) of philosophical ontology for software engineering?
- Is ontology relevant only to the individual object model or are there lessons from ontology to be learned at the methodological level?
- How can ontology support software architectures?
- Why are most object models not ontologically sound in the first place ö even though they are supposedly closely reflecting reality?
- Where is the gap rooted? How to make sure not to be trapped?
Are there examples of how philosophical ontology has improved software engineering?
What attempts have been made to apply ontology (including philosophical ontology)?
- Where and why have they succeeded or failed?
- Is it more beneficial to establish reference ontologies or to extend the object oriented methodologies?
- How are ontologies represented anyway?
- What are the benefits and limitations of these approaches?
- Can philosophical ontology help in system integration projects? And if so, how?
- Are there any methodologies for applying philosophical ontology to software development?

It will be useful to identify application areas within object oriented software engineering where philosophical ontology could usefully be deployed. Examples include:

- Enterprise ontologies,
- Expression of common semantics across a number of systems,
- Expressivity necessary for semantics description,
- Methodologies, approaches, and paradigms for enterprise integration,
- Model translations and integration,
- Possibility for reference semantics,
- The needs of emerging technologies such as semantic web, semantic GRID, and web services,
- Semantic problems of legacy migration,
- Semantics of enterprise modelling and enterprise architecture,
- Semantics of software system architecture,
- Semantics of interfaces – for support at development time or at runtime.

Organization

The workshop will be structured with the aim of stimulating creativity and discussion among the participants. The participants will be given an opportunity to briefly summarise their papers. The majority of the workshop will be devoted to discussion of issues raised in the papers. Group discussions may be organized on the basis of the list of issues identified. Ample time will be reserved to plenary discussions. Participants should be prepared to engage in lively discussions targeted at the establishment of common ground and promising routes for further work.
The workshop will end with a final plenary session summarizing the important points raised in earlier discussions and drawing lines for possible follow up.

Organizing Commitee

Petra Becker-Pechau (University of Hamburg)
Pierre Grenon (University of Leipzig)
Mark Lycett (Brunel University)
Chris Partridge (Brunel University)
Joerg Pechau (CoreMedia AG)
Dirk Siebert (University of Leipzig)

Submissions

Positions Papers in PDF, PS or MS Word format are to be sent to Dirk Siebert (dirk.siebert@ifomis.uni-leipzig.de) by April 5, 2004.

Important Dates

Deadline for submission: April 5, 2004
Notification: April 26, 2004
Workshop: June 15, 2004

Further information will be posted on the workshop page:
http://www.ifomis.uni-Leipzig.de/Events/ECOOP/2004/WS_PhilosophyOntologyInformationSystems/

For travel Information and accomodation, consult the ECOOP website:
http://www.ifi.uio.no/ecoop2004/

Confessions of a Semi-Successful Author. Today, on Salon [subscription or ad-viewing required], the travails of the mid-list author in contemporary publishing: If you don’t want to hear about the noir underside of publishing — if you’re a writer longing for a literary career, or a reader who’s happier not knowing that producing and marketing a… [Planned Obsolescence]

——-

it's not about art, it's not about literature, it's not about the author (other than as symbol of revenue) or the readers (other than as revenue streams)…. publishing is about money. plain and simple.

Hardware, software, and nowhere. Working with sources from early 1980s, it is obvious that computers have changed, and we have changed our ideas about… [GENDER & COMPUTING]

——-

isn't this position only speaking to commodity hardware and only in the time….. i mean nowhere today is still nowhere but the computer clubs in the 80's were somewhere's and they built some computers and fixed others. nowhere is still a time commitment i guess….