News UPdate. Yes, I broke wordpress again, or it was still broken. Jeremy helped me work through the logic to find the missing file(s). Now just have to fix something else… but I'm keeping away from rampant computer use and doing other useful things. Like starting to work again on the Medieveal Latin British vampire stories. I did two papers on these fragments in the works of Walter Map and William of Newburgh last year, and have done nothing since, but now Quinn Yarbro is co-editing an anthology of old and obscure vampire stories with college level articles, and I'm submitting the map/newburgh stuff. One of my two major summer projects. The other will be on blogs and hacking with KAT! I hope.

In the mean time, thanks go out to Rochelle for giving me a gmail account… [Team Polysynchronous - Just Differently Intelligent - - Just Differently Intelligent -]

—-

mumbles something about fixing it friday, where is that rm-f command anyway…. no, if asked, i'll fixors it, as per my contract with the world, some sort of permanent penance for portending to be a realist in a former life i think.

EFF Publishes Patent Hit List. Winnowing a field of nearly 200 questionable patents, the Electronic Frontier Foundation decides to challenge 10 of what the group considers to be the most dubious and abused technology patents. By Daniel Terdiman. [Wired News] [A blog doesn't need a clever name]

—-

i wish they didn't have to do this, most of those patents are completely improper in regards to what a patent should be.

i downloaded this earlier today on my every so often on interesting uses of political economy. having just read it, i find that it makes the pertinance of political economy for those interested in librarianship, but it doesn't really go as far as i'd like talking about the becoming part of librarianship that is part of the political economy, nor does it really deal in any depth with the obvious relationships between andrew carnegie's recognition of the library as state economic driver and the role of the librarian. however, it is a fantastic marker of a future direction of research.

this looks like it might be interesting….

this sort of speaks a wee bit negatively toward the way the republican party thinks about sex. but maybe they just believe it should be deregulated? no, their marriage policy somehwat contrary to that, hmmm…. well, remember tailhook?